Write about your blogs elsewhere to keep them searchable !

Write both the names and URLs of your blogs and websites, in posts on Medium or Substack, and anywhere else you find it works, in order to make them appear as search results in Google or Bing. Circulate the tip to do this. Do it because your sites themselves now may not appear in google search results, not even if their exact names or unique phrases in them are searched.

Suspiciously unaccountable quirks of “indexing” of sites, by their bots that constantly review the web for present or new sites, are happening. You can confirm so as simply, ironically, as by googling on the question of how to make it list your site. At present no search results call the problem politically motivated Instead they explain it as that sites may have code settings that discourage searchability, yet you are not aware of this, for a long established site that always used to appear in searches, and you would need a mindnumbing education in site coding and jargon like “root directory” to find the problem, or that Google’s bots may decide a new or altered site page needs verifying of ownership. Pointless new problems that searching used to work better without, clearly.

If folks can’t find your site even by searching on key phrases or its name, that completely stops you telling the folks in Youtube comments that your site exists, or of any info your site makes public. This because, as is already well known, Youtube’s automated moderation blocks practically any post with a url in it, and even with a disguised url, it recognises “com” or “wordpress” within longer strings of characters. Quora will allow a url once but it too classes as spam and autoblocks several postings of the same url. So you need to make site names and key phrases findability by writing them in places like here.

All asking or searching tells you that Google or Bing will only receive any requests for site listing if in the process you verify your site ownership, yet why do you need to own a site to want to make it findable? and this is now by a complicated method called “DNS verification”. It involves adding a line of code they give you, to a particular place in your site’s settings. Even after you do this, they can still take undetermined months to catch up with the searchability ! You have only put your site into a queue for that ! Now, if the problem has happened to a Wordpress site, there is a money trap here. Wordpress only gives you access to the DNS settings as part of a paid subscription for your site. Though Wordpress sites are available free, if you choose a free site you can’t do this “DNS verification” thing on it, so can’t stop the big search engines ignoring the site for unaccountable reasons.

This trap is particularly striking when Wordpress has just, on Jul 14, announced to its users Bao Nguyen’s new campaigning short film Code For the People, https://codeforthepeople.com. It is a call to use “open source” public sharing of programs and code, for anyone’s use qnd ownership of their own work, to defend the open internet from growing more business controlled, and it is largely an advert for Wordpress as a leader of this cause. It gives the name “platform decay” to the notorious business phenomenon, where something on the web, a service or a writing place or a community, is initially provided free, but after it has picked up a lot of users and their online lives have grown dependent on it, it reduces or ends the free element and makes the thing paid for. It is a good point in the film, one of the ways that business breaks down the open internet. It adds up to a pull back to the old pressure on the public to trust and only believe the elite-led media-selected view of reality, shutting out everything outside the core consensuses in politics and science and religion, that used to be such an oppression of thought in the era before the web.

Hind Rajab whenever big organisations mess with you on the phone

The Voice of Hind Rajab is an era definingly important film, but in more ways than everyone knows.

Yes it's defining of a population under genocidal conditions and the personal humanitarian meaning of being in the middle of that level of destruction. That will always be, and it will always be with the importance of seeing this not only on one side, but on both sides of the Israel-Palestine tragedy, with parallel humanitarian horrors also for the Jews murdered in the Oct 7 massacres many of whose stories are getting told in Quora.

But the film has an impact outside the Israel-Palestine conflict, more globally on all fairness struggles and all problems and fights suffered in trying to solve unfair situations. It will be citable for all time as a moral statement on THE NATURE OF BUREAUCRACY. On every organisation you ever deal with that puts up difficult walls on the phone, is noncommittal and unpromissory and avoidant of the point, or wastes time with call links or unnecessary side points when the call is urgent or you are watching its cost. This is what, in the film's true story, the Red Crescent hq suffered when trying to organise a safe rescue of a 6 year old child trapped alone in a battle zone, making ihe effort fail after hours of mounting trauma for them and the child.

This experience can include from autistic big organisations like Autism Initiatives or NAS, or health and social services for parents pursuing a diagnosis when a child is getting maltreated by school and the system deliberately wants to drag its feet against stopping this. The Voice of Hind Rajab will now be a name to cite as an argument.

Using the phone can already be really difficult when you are aspie without a flowing voice or easy finding of words.

Recommendation to see it, from a member who already had, has been a success of ELAS's group meet. He was able to describe to me what it was like. He was clear, where cinema posters for it had not been, that being dramatised did not mean it contained any gratuitious fictional emotional twists, as too many films do. This one responsibly just tells a true story soberly to the factual record of the phone recordings as it happened.

Maurice Frank
23 Jan 2026

Youtube censors Edinburgh tram options !

Under a video by CityMoose channel on the tram expansion, that supports the Roseburn path option, including without local knowledge the total path option at Telford Road, Youtube is utterly banning the following comment. Not even the first sentence on its own, or using 1s and 0s, any comment referring to station siting in any way will not post -

《 You are wrong about Telford Road. Station's site on the path route will be in a park and behind some flats, hence lonely, won't feel safe after dark. I heard that raised in the public drop-in. Its distance from the hospital too, across a housing estate, is not good for infirm or ageing patients who can't walk well. It will be a white elephant.

The road is wide, has a hospital gate straight onto it, has not got homes straight onto it. North side of the road, in Drylaw park's corner, there is a strip of ground behind a substation, gentle gradient, where you can bring the line up from path to road, so no need to build an intrusive ramp. 》

What world geopolitics or radicalism is there in words about a bloody tram line ? Made this point in favour of the Telford Road option in my trams consultation submission. Also

• instead of writing about cross-city services from Balgreen, could reopen as tram the old Corstorphine rail branch, there have often been views on local social media for that, folks who remember it say it has always been slower getting into town by bus without it. Most of the branch route still exists as a park path. Last 1/3 mile does not, so it would take an on-road bit to reach Corstorphine village. That is short enough, and not in town, that it would not slow up the buses like they are saying the Orchard Brae route will do.
• Cockburn Association, that cares about old buildings, has blogged warning of structural doubts in building the southward line over South Bridge. Modern big train-weight trams will stress the structure far more than the bus-sized ones in the historic tram era, and is a load the bridge was not built for. Same concern as for Dean Bridge, but while the Orchard Brae route is one of 3 options, South Bridge is a less known issue because the south line's route straight down the A7 is just getting taken for granted. Clearly there is a responsibility not to take it so.

If the line was diverted down Holyrood Road and near parliament, it would be a bit longer and have more corners, but it offsetting so, it would have an off-road section and avoid trying implausibly to run through the overcrowdedness of South Bridge and Nicolson St. Street widths would allow it to turn from North Bridge eastward into High St, with the northbound track off-road there to avoid the notorious tailbacks into that crossroads. Blackfriars St, Cowgate, Holyrood Road, then it could go off-road on the waste ground that is Holyrood Park's edge behind Dumbiedykes, and rise from the ground at gentle gradient by a ramp to beat the sharp rise in ground level it will eventually meet. Though the same rise prevents the line going up Pleasance because of steep gradient, that is on-road surrounded by streets with no space to beat it by a ramp, while in Holyrood there is that space. The least bumpy course over that hill, just behind the end of Dumbiedykes Road, already has an old wall along it, that obviously was easiest to build there, so the line would go through that, use its ramp to take the hill at gentler gradient than steep Braidwood Gate path up to behind Crags sport centre, Bowmont Place where it will not affect home entrances, St Leonard's St, then for local opinion to choose which street to cross back onto Clerk St via.

Maurice Frank
2 Oct 2025

public be moved to keep bureaucracy off the graves you care for

change.org/p/oppose-removal-of-grave-ironworks #westlothiancouncil #disgustingbureaucrats #bureaucrats #oppression

This type of arrogance where it hurts can move the public to react against bureaucrats as they need to.

A 16 year old boy dead from some road accident, which itself is evil enough and attests the world to be so, his family set up on his grave some honouring structures that are made of iron. 26 years later, out of the blue, arbitrarily without consultation, West Lothian council arbitrarily declares new rules to ban and remove them.

learned of from Nextdoor, 17 Jul 2025

rollout of health hubs: believe that ?

Labour supporting Youtube channel "A Different Bias", Phil Moorhouse, has made a video on a new policy for local health hubs, for the NHS in England. "Revolutionising mental health: the NHS's game changing plan" but it's also about returning some aspects of physical health closer to communities than to overloaded hospitals. So what is it, a kind of cottage hospital able to do more than a surgery ? Surgeries are already a type of hub.

In their best imagined multifunctional form, these hubs could be one stop shops, and the videoer mentions so. He says"if the reality matches the vision, then what we are talking about here is lots of key public services in one one stop shop accessible for everyone"

"although this is a 10 year plan, they are going to need some of it to be very visible before the next election ... in terms of political strategy, what I would be wanting to do is setting up some of these centres in key Red Wall areas, you call them pilots I suppose, set them up in key Red Wall areas really quickly, Now that would not only provide a lot of useful learning opportunities for rolling them out across the rest of England ..."

Scotland's experience with the autistic one stop shops is a cautionary example. It had this rollout aspiration. Oh we will start with a couple of them and roll them out to everywhere. How many olans never get completed, rollouts most of all. More red flag than red wall - if they go this rollout way, they roll down the same rabbit hole as we have seen autism service in Scotland roll down. Regional unfair disparities and long term stuck inertia towards filling in the gaps.

Thus, this comment on the video - "Experience from autistic one-stop shops in Scotland. Pilots leads to a sense of ticked boxes to have done it in some places, leads to deferring to aspiration and never reaching the ideal of serving everywhere, leads to incomplete coverage with negative issues from postcode lottery unfairness. They are still this way 20 years after they began, and in some places outside the big 2 cities, the autistic charities chosen to run them closed them down, either at term ends, or even sooner to replace them with their own simpler services !"

dangerously random ceasing to function by old bus passes

In bus pass renewals, there has continued for years, I found out last time round, an extremely dangerous system for all vulnerable passholder groups. After the renewal application goes in, you don't know in how many days your old pass will stop working, it's supposed to be a few, but happens without any check or confirmation on whether your new pass actually has arrived. Because folks are not alerted to this either, they can be using their old pass in good faith, far from home, when suddenly at any time of day it stops working.

This happened to me, randomly late afternoon in Leith, in my last renewal 3 years ago. That is why at this renewal, to fight this system and not accept this danger I have only put the application in at last minute before my pass expires, meaning I will take some days perhaps a week without a pass. In fact, I was lucky to find out that the council's "One Edinburgh" office, who issue the passes, closes at 3:00 on Fridays, and a decent hub library who would do the renewal by emailing them after that hour. So that it will not yet be seen or acted on during the weekend, hence should not affect my pass until after its expiry. It has still worked this morning - posting this on the bus in for today's ELAS.

Both Transport Scotland and the One Edinburgh office deny any power or say over when old passes stop working, nor do they say or appear to even know exactly who does work it, who there ethically should be public contact details for. According to that council office, the system is even worse now. They are now saying, that from as soon as the application is made, the old pass can stop working at unpredictably any time, and they have encountered cases where it happened immediately. This hammered in with insultingly excessive repeatings of the word "unfortunately" to pass buck and deny having any control over it. But this is while the MyGov site at mygov.scot/disabled-bus-pass/replace still says it takes a few days.

So instead of asserting a worse position than is MyGov's public info, this council office can, and ethically should, hold Transport Scotland or MyGov to that info to be accurate: contest the present unpredictability, on passholders' behalf, and tell passholders also who exactly to challenge as responsible for it. Lobbied to councillor on the transport committee.

Maurice Frank
31 May 2025

Jun 14 -
Councillor Kevin Lang, Almond ward, fine achievement to obtain this more definite info on deactivating old passes 7 days from a renewal application. This is One Edinburgh's answer to him -

NEC bus passes when renewed or replaced trigger de-activation of existing cards as a matter of course. However the timescales vary.

Lost or stolen cards and "hot-listed" as soon as possible after report.

Bus passes that are due to expire and need renewal, are either de-activated 7 days after a new card has been ordered or sooner if the expiry date printed on the card is within the 7 days. New bus passes can take up to 7 days to arrive, but most are delivered within two to three working days after application.

If a cardholder gets in touch about 7- 10 days before the current card expires with the relevant documentation to prove continued eligibility they should not be without free bus during the renewal process.

Bus passes may stop working if they become faulty, this can happen at any time, including during the renewal process.Human error can happen, so for instance if a card requiring renewal was incorrectly recorded as lost, it would cease to work as noted above.

The National Entitlement Card Programme Office in Dundee (NECPO) oversees the issuing authorities on behalf of Transport Scotland. NECPO may be the undisclosed agency referred to. NECPO have a feed back form and information about how to make a formal complaint at https://www.nec.scot/contact

silver tongued arrogance

The democratic civilities around religious liberty and all having lots of different views on what happens when we die, is among the widest appreciated and valued items of personal liberty. We remember the Middle Ages history of inquisitions and religious wars, and every time religion comes up we experience the value of our liberty to think something else than the person or group we are talking to. Some follow a politeness tip to avoid it in conversation because of the different views, but folks interested in the subject enjoy exploring the ideas range.

Part of the civil coexistence is to know that we will each apply our own beliefs to each other's deaths. That's common sense. The only exception to the civility is the insultingness and evil fear play involved in threats of hell, and those are obviously a personal hostility and bigotry so they breach civility. All the range of beliefs that are not control threats or hostile like that, but that are civil to imagine, the civility of coexistence applies to. Whatever you believe about death is what you believe has happened.

An author of a well regarded autism book interpreting our community as a civil rights movement, Neurotribes, Steve Silberman, has died suddenly. There is some mourning around on Facebook. But also, there is a post going round, that he posted only a year before, telling everyone how to react to his death. It orders, dictates, not to react to it saying anything that expressed any afterlife beliefs. He calls those "comforting fables", which comes from the hardline atheist astronomer Carl Sagan. He was entitled to his view like anyone, and to have any memorials follow it. But he was not entitled to dictate to everyone else not to react to the event of his death through their beliefs.

He dictates to all to take an anti-afterlife lesson of our impermanence, from his death. Dictates to arrive at his view. That's overbearing dictatorial arrogance. He tried to use instruction on how to handle his death, to trap folks into his belief position, as an outcome of following the instruction. To censor folks' own perceptions in how they react to a death. That was controlling arrogance and a misuse of the civility code around death.

For it he forfeits the civility code. Your beliefs are your human right. It makes it fair to only remember him as an arrogant jerk. To realise from this that he was that, and for it not ceased to merit positive remembering.

Maurice Frank
4 Sep 2024